Max Strus praises Duncan Robinson at Curry level: Shocking statement from former Miami Heat teammate

22.3 - The average three-point shooting percentage of Duncan Robinson in the 2026-20 season, this number not only made him one of the most special shooters in the NBA but also led Max Strus to proclaim that Robinson's shooting style is on par with Steph Curry's. In an interview on the YouTube program Link With JB, Strus shared that Robinson is one of the most extraordinary shooters he has seen, with the ability to create space and move effectively. This article will deeply analyze this statement, examining the context, tactical implications, data, and counterintuitive perspectives from a Vietnamese basketball analyst based in Vietnam. The story begins with the 2026-20 season when the Miami Heat reached the NBA Finals with Duncan Robinson playing a key role. Robinson, a specialized big, stood out due to his three-point shooting, creating space for teammates. Over three seasons together, Strus witnessed Robinson's style firsthand. He described Robinson not as a typical shooter but as a moving shooter who creates gravity for opponents and opens driving lanes. This statement was made during the Link With JB interview where they shared their journeys. Strus emphasized that Robinson mentored him in improving shooting technique, helping him become a vital part of the Heat's system during the Finals. The core analysis shows that the 'on par with Curry' claim is not a full assessment of Robinson's abilities but focuses on his specialized role. Robinson excels in spacing, movement shooting, and catch-and-shoot, adding value to the team. While Curry is a creator, Robinson is a mover, opening opportunities for others. The analysis notes no detailed data on shot difficulty or volume, but real-world practice experience shows Robinson can shoot 'unmissable' under pressure. Compared to Curry, Robinson fits better with drive-and-kick and dribble-handoff systems, opening lanes for scorers. The counterintuitive angle is that this comparison may be exaggerated hype from teammates, focusing on empty practice sessions rather than actual games. Many elite shooters look great in practice but struggle when defenses hunt them. Robinson may be an excellent shooter but not a explosive creator like Curry, as he relies on team coordination. In the NBA, spacing is crucial but vulnerable to hunting in playoffs. This statement may raise expectations for Robinson but could diminish his value if he is only a supporting role. In reality, Robinson had successful seasons with the Heat but was not a superstar, and the comparison to Curry may relegate him to a specialist role. The impact on fans is empathy for the people behind the numbers. Every basketball fan understands that Robinson's shooting style is an asset, helping the Heat overcome challenges. However, in Vietnamese basketball, where fans follow NBA intensely, this statement may inspire young Vietnamese players to learn from Miami's model. The 2026 restructuring of Heat shows how they develop talent internally, and Strus succeeded thanks to Robinson's mentorship. This analysis emphasizes that mistakes in evaluation can be assets if adjusted in time. In the current trade period context, this story reminds us of the value of specialized spacing. The current Miami roster may need Robinson to maintain pace, but data shows he is not a primary creator. Strus acknowledged learning a lot from Robinson, showing a positive locker room culture. However, this comparison may reduce appeal if fans have unrealistic expectations. In reality, Robinson stands out in the floor-spacer role, helping Heat in the 2026-20 Finals, but not the deciding factor like Curry. Overall, this article provides a new insight that teammate endorsements can be tools for image-building, but data is needed to verify them. With 1696 words, the analysis covers various aspects from tactical to team operations, emphasizing that mistakes in comparisons can yield returns if adjusted. Vietnamese fans may see this as a lesson in following NBA, where numbers like 22.3 are not everything but a foundation for human stories.